Overview

The following is an overview of NZBMA’s Ultimate Body Mechanic Treatment. Representing a comprehensive 90-minute evidence-based neuromuscular manual therapy intervention developed within Aotearoa New Zealand's regulatory healthcare framework by Wayne Armour. The known NZBMA Body Mechanic Approach since 2016, integrates contemporary massage therapy foundations, sports science research, biomechanical analyse, neuroscience principles and biopsychosocial theory to address neuromusculoskeletal dysfunction through a systematic four-phase protocol. The massage-based intervention encompasses biomechanical assessment, targeted hands-on manual therapy techniques, movement re-education and client empowerment strategies. The following examines the theoretical foundations, clinical protocols and regulatory context underpinning this unique treatment and its approach, while also acknowledging the need for further research.

Keywords: body mechanic, neuromuscular therapy, biopsychosocial model, massage therapy, manual therapy, health and wellbeing, rehabilitation, movement re-education, Aotearoa New Zealand healthcare regulation

 Introduction,

Present-day soft tissue manual therapy practice has evolved significantly from traditional pathoanatomical models toward comprehensive biopsychosocial frameworks that acknowledge the complex interplay of physical, neurological and psychosocial factors in treatment outcomes (Bialosky et al., 2009). This paradigm shift recognises pain and dysfunction as multidimensional experiences requiring integrated intervention approaches rather than singular mechanical solutions. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the regulatory landscape for manual therapy has undergone substantial transformation since the mid-20th century. The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act (HPCA) 2003 resulted in the repeal of the 1949 Physiotherapy Act and, as a consequence, the provision of therapeutic and sports massage by trained and qualified massage therapists is no longer illegal in Aotearoa New Zealand (Dryden et al., 2012). The HPCA Act 2003 includes mechanisms to ensure that practitioners are competent and fit to practise their professions for the duration of their professional lives, with its principal purpose being to protect the health and safety of the public (Ministry of Health, 2023). NZBMA’s Body Mechanic Approach emerges from this regulatory framework as an advanced application of neuromuscular therapy principles, addressing identified gaps between symptom-focused interventions and comprehensive approaches that target underlying dysfunction patterns. The following presents the theoretical foundations, clinical protocols and evidence base supporting NZBMA’s Ultimate Body Mechanic Treatment.

 Theoretical Framework

Biopsychosocial Paradigm: The biopsychosocial model, originally proposed by Engel (1977), provides the foundational framework for understanding pain and dysfunction as complex phenomena involving biological, psychological and social factors (Gatchel et al., 2007). This model argues that pain is a personal experience that emerges from a dynamic interplay between biological, psychological and social factors (European Pain Federation, 2023). Research demonstrates that longitudinal observational findings supports a strong bidirectional link between psychosocial factors and chronic pain outcomes (Edwards et al., 2018). Building off this evidence, supports the application of biopsychosocial principles within manual therapy practice, with systematic reviews indicating improved outcomes when psychosocial factors are addressed alongside physical interventions (Mankelow et al., 2022). This approach diverges from reductionist biomedical models by recognising the multifactorial nature of pain and dysfunction experiences.

Neuroplasticity and Motor Learning: Neuroplasticity, defined as the nervous system's capacity to reorganise structure and function in response to experience, provides the theoretical foundation for movement re-education interventions (Cramer et al., 2011). Research demonstrates that motor learning approaches utilising error-based feedback mechanisms can effectively modify aberrant movement patterns and reduce pain perception (Moseley & Butler, 2015). The integration of neuroplasticity principles within manual therapy recognises that tissue-based interventions must be supplemented by neural re-education to achieve sustainable functional improvements (Nijs et al., 2014). This understanding underpins the movement integration component of the Ultimate Body Mechanic Treatment protocol.

Mechanotransduction Theory: Mechanotransduction refers to the cellular process whereby mechanical stimuli are converted into biochemical signals, influencing tissue adaptation and repair mechanisms (Ingber, 2006). Current research indicates that appropriate mechanical loading can stimulate beneficial cellular responses, including enhanced collagen synthesis and tissue remodelling (Khan & Scott, 2009). Manual therapy techniques are hypothesised to influence mechanotransduction pathways through the application of controlled mechanical forces, potentially promoting tissue healing and adaptation (Schleip et al., 2012). However, the specific mechanisms and optimal loading parameters remain areas of active research investigation.

 Aotearoa New Zealand Regulatory Context

The legislative framework governing manual therapy in Aotearoa New Zealand delineates the scope and constraints of non-registered therapeutic practices. The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 establishes a regulatory structure to ensure public safety by overseeing health practitioners, mitigating risks associated with professional practice (Ministry of Health, 2023). Within this context, massage therapy practitioners’ function as non-registered health service providers, exempt from statutory regulation under the aforementioned Act (Dryden et al., 2012). Nevertheless, they are subject to consumer protection legislation and ethical standards promulgated by professional bodies. The introduction of degree-level qualifications, such as the Degree in Therapeutic and Sports Massage (DQMT) offered by institutions like the Southern Institute of Technology, signifies a progression toward elevated professional standards and evidence-informed practice (Dryden et al., 2012). This academic foundation underpins advanced interventions, including the NZBMA’s Ultimate Body Mechanic Treatment.

Historically, the Masseurs Registration Act 1920 was enacted to regulate massage practitioners, responding to the growing application of physical therapies in healthcare, particularly in post-World War I rehabilitation settings (Sullivan & Wong, 2012). This legislation established the Masseurs Registration Board, comprising a Registrar as Chair, a registered masseur and a medical practitioner, appointed by the Governor-General for three-year terms (New Zealand Legislation, 1920). Registration necessitated proof of competence through training, examination, or three years of practice within the preceding five years, with wartime service contributing to eligibility (New Zealand Legislation, 1920). The Registrar maintained a public register, issuing certificates upon fee payment, while penalties of up to fifty pounds were imposed for fraudulent registration, and unregistered practitioners using professional titles faced fines of up to twenty pounds (New Zealand Legislation, 1920). Disciplinary measures permitted removal from the register for misconduct or criminal convictions, with appeals adjudicated by a Board of Appeal assisted by a Magistrate (New Zealand Legislation, 1920). This Act professionalised massage by integrating it with medical oversight, particularly in hospital settings, however, curtailed independent practice, positioning masseurs as subordinate to medical authority (Sullivan & Wong, 2012). The Masseurs Registration Amendment Act 1935 extended training requirements for nurses to twenty-one months, elevating entry barriers and influencing professional access (New Zealand Legislation, 1935).

The Physiotherapy Amendment Act 1964 refined the administrative and governance framework of the Physiotherapy Act 1949, which superseded the 1920 Act (New Zealand Legislation, 1964). The role of Inspector of Physiotherapy was predesignated as Advisory Physiotherapist and a Deputy Registrar position was instituted to ensure operational continuity (New Zealand Legislation, 1964). The Board’s composition was revised to include representation from the New Zealand Society of Physiotherapists Incorporated, amplifying professional influence (New Zealand Legislation, 1964). Provisional certificates, valid for up to six months and renewable, were introduced for qualified applicants and public access to the register was mandated during reasonable hours (New Zealand Legislation, 1964). Suspension inquiries were initiated upon disability notifications, with restoration contingent on Board approval and medical certification (New Zealand Legislation, 1964). These reforms indirectly constrained masseurs by reinforcing physiotherapy’s regulatory dominance over therapeutic massage, limiting masseurs’ scope to non-therapeutic practices unless registered as physiotherapists (Sullivan & Wong, 2012). The Physiotherapy Amendment Act 1999 modernised the 1949 Act by incorporating electronic processes and enhancing Board autonomy (New Zealand Legislation, 1999). Provisions for electronic transmission were defined and the Board was reconstituted as a body corporate with up to eight members appointed for three-year terms, subject to a nine-year service limit (New Zealand Legislation, 1999). Formalised staff appointments, including Registrar and Deputy, were established, alongside financial management protocols involving bank accounts and annual audits (New Zealand Legislation, 1999). Transitional provisions preserved existing registrations, ensuring continuity (New Zealand Legislation, 1999). This amendment sustained physiotherapy’s exclusive authority over therapeutic massage, compelling unregulated masseurs to adopt voluntary standards to remain competitive in an increasingly professionalised health sector (Sullivan & Wong, 2012).

The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 consolidated regulation across health professions, including physiotherapy, by establishing authorities to define practice scopes, registration criteria and ongoing competence programs (New Zealand Legislation, 2003). By repealing the Physiotherapy Act 1949, it permitted non-physiotherapists to perform therapeutic massage legally, marking a pivotal shift for masseurs (New Zealand Legislation, 2003). Complaints were addressed through professional conduct committees and the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal, ensuring accountability (New Zealand Legislation, 2003). While physiotherapy benefited from structured oversight, massage therapy remained unregulated, relying on voluntary organisations like Massage Aotearoa New Zealand to uphold standards, prompting discussions about statutory regulation to address consumer protection concerns (Sullivan & Wong, 2012). The Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 was instituted to safeguard consumer rights in health and disability services, applying to all providers, including unregulated massage therapists (New Zealand Legislation, 1994). This Act established a Commissioner to investigate violations of the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights, which mandates informed consent, respectful treatment and effective complaint resolution (New Zealand Legislation, 1994). For masseurs, adherence to this Code ensured ethical practice, particularly in areas such as consent, despite the absence of statutory regulation (Smith & Darzins, 2018). Enforcement mechanisms included mediation and referrals to the Human Rights Review Tribunal, bolstering consumer protections (New Zealand Legislation, 1994). Additional legislation has profoundly influenced masseurs in New Zealand. The Tohunga Suppression Act 1907 prohibited traditional Māori healers from claiming supernatural cures, suppressing mirimiri (Māori massage) and marginalising indigenous practitioners until its repeal in 1962 (New Zealand Legislation, 1907; Sullivan & Wong, 2012). The Massage Parlours Act 1978 regulated premises associated with prostitution, adversely affecting the public perception of massage therapy by linking it to illicit activities (New Zealand Legislation, 1978). The Prostitution Reform Act 2003 decriminalised sex work, clarifying distinctions between therapeutic and non-therapeutic massage, thereby enhancing masseurs’ legitimacy (New Zealand Legislation, 2003). The Privacy Act 2020 governs client data protection, obligating masseurs to secure personal information, while the Human Rights Act 1993 prohibits discrimination in service provision, shaping ethical practice (New Zealand Legislation, 1993, 2020). Voluntary regulation through Massage Aotearoa New Zealand, established in 2007, has promoted codes of conduct and education, addressing gaps in statutory oversight (Sullivan & Wong, 2012).

The Bachelor of Therapeutic and Sports Massage (B.Th.S.M), offered by the Southern Institute of Technology, represents a significant advancement in degree-level education for massage practitioners, accredited as the inaugural program of its kind in 2002, with graduates emerging from 2004 (Sullivan & Wong, 2012). This three-year, Level 7 qualification, accredited by the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA), comprises 360 credits encompassing anatomy, physiology, pathology, therapeutics, clinical reasoning, functional assessment, massage for physical performance, research statistics and business management principles. Students undertake approximately 320 hours of clinical and industry practice, primarily in the third year through blended learning, to develop proficiency in wellness and rehabilitation interventions for musculoskeletal conditions across diverse populations. Entry requirements include NCEA Level 3 or equivalent for applicants under 20 or relevant prior learning for those aged 20 and above by March 1 of the enrolment year, with provisions for special admission via NZQA Level 4 qualifications such as the New Zealand Diploma in Remedial Massage. The program prepares graduates for employment in clinical settings, sports teams, hospitals or independent practices, both domestically and internationally, promoting reflective practitioners with research literacy and the capacity to integrate into multidisciplinary health teams, aligning with the evolving demand for evidence-based soft-tissue therapy (Higgs & Edwards, 1999; Southern Institute of Technology, 2024). The degree program from the New Zealand College of Massage, introduced in 2006 as a subsequent bachelor-level offering, contributed to the expansion of higher education for massage therapists amid professional legitimation efforts (Sullivan & Wong, 2012). Accredited by the NZQA, it emphasised holistic and remedial massage training, building on national certificate and diploma standards established in 1999 and 2001 to standardise competencies beyond certificate-level entry. Graduates acquired skills in therapeutic applications, client assessment and integration with allied health practices, supporting roles in wellness clinics, spas or multidisciplinary settings. However, this program has been discontinued, reflecting shifts in the unregulated massage sector, where providers like the SIT have consolidated offerings (Careers New Zealand, 2024; Sullivan & Wong, 2012). This aligns with industry trends toward NZQA Level 5 minimums since 2017 and voluntary accreditation through bodies like Massage Aotearoa New Zealand, prioritising accessible diplomas while degree pathways remain limited to select institutions.

Collectively, the legislative framework governing masseurs in Aotearoa New Zealand has evolved from stringent medical oversight under the Masseurs Registration Act 1920 and Physiotherapy Act 1949 to a deregulated environment following the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003, which removed barriers to therapeutic massage. Ancillary laws, including the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994, Privacy Act 2020 and Human Rights Act 1993, impose ethical and legal obligations, while historical restrictions such as the Tohunga Suppression Act 1907 and Massage Parlours Act 1978 have shaped cultural and professional challenges. These developments reflect a shift toward voluntary regulation, with ongoing discourse regarding statutory oversight to ensure consumer safety and professional credibility.

 Treatment Protocol

Protocol Overview: The Ultimate Body Mechanic Treatment comprises a systematic four-phase intervention delivered over 90 minutes. This extended duration facilitates comprehensive assessment and intervention while allowing adequate time for neurophysiological responses to manual therapy techniques (Bialosky et al., 2009). Each phase builds progressively upon the preceding intervention components.

Phase One: Comprehensive Assessment: The initial assessment phase utilises systematic evaluation procedures to identify movement dysfunction patterns, tissue restrictions and contributing factors. Assessment components include:

• Postural and Movement Analysis: Observational analysis of static posture and dynamic movement patterns provides information regarding biomechanical adaptations and compensatory strategies (Sahrmann, 2002). While specific screening tools such as the Functional Movement Screen have shown variable reliability, systematic movement assessment remains a cornerstone of clinical evaluation (Bonazza et al., 2017).

• Palpatory Assessment: Manual palpation techniques assess tissue quality, mobility and sensitivity patterns. Research indicates that skilled practitioners can reliably identify areas of altered tissue texture and mobility, though the clinical significance of these findings requires careful interpretation (Rajendran et al., 2016).

• Symptom Documentation: Standardised outcome measures document pain patterns, functional limitations and symptom behaviour. Validated instruments such as the Numerical Rating Scale and condition-specific functional measures provide baseline data for treatment monitoring (Jensen et al., 2003).

Phase Two: Manual Therapy Interventions: The soft tissue manual therapy phase applies evidence-based techniques targeting identified dysfunction patterns. Intervention components include:

• Soft Tissue Mobilisation: Manual techniques address tissue restrictions and promote local circulation. Research demonstrates that soft tissue mobilisation can produce immediate improvements in range of motion and pain levels, though long-term effects remain variable (Cheatham et al., 2015).

• Fascial Restrictions: Passive soft tissue applied range of movements (ROM) can address fascial mobility restrictions and stimulates the mechanoreceptor activity resulting in increased joint movement. Systematic reviews indicate that soft tissue techniques can provide short-term pain relief and mobility improvements for specific conditions where fascial restrictions are present (Bialosky et al., 2009).

• Trigger Point Therapy: Pressure-based techniques target localised areas of muscle hyperactivity. Evidence suggests that trigger point interventions can reduce local pain and improve function, though optimal treatment parameters require further investigation (Cerezo-Téllez et al., 2016).

Phase Three: Movement Integration: The movement re-education phase addresses neuromuscular control deficits and promotes functional movement patterns:

• Motor Control Training: Specific exercises target identified movement dysfunction patterns utilising feedback and progression principles. Research demonstrates that motor control interventions can improve movement quality and reduce pain in various populations (Macedo et al., 2009).

• Proprioceptive Enhancement: Balance and coordination exercises address sensorimotor deficits contributing to dysfunction. Evidence indicates that proprioceptive training can improve joint position sense and reduce injury risk (Zech et al., 2010).

• Functional Integration: Task-specific exercises promote transfer of corrected movement patterns to daily activities. This approach recognises the importance of context-specific learning in motor skill acquisition (Wulf & Lewthwaite, 2016).

Phase Four: Client Education and Empowerment: The final phase emphasises client education and self-management strategies:

• Exercise Prescription: Individualised home exercise programs address identified dysfunction patterns and promote continued improvement. Research demonstrates that adherence to prescribed exercises significantly influences treatment outcomes (Jordan et al., 2010).

• Pain Science Education: Client education regarding pain mechanisms and self-management strategies has demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain and disability across various conditions (Louw et al., 2011).

• Behavioural Strategies: Practical approaches for incorporating therapeutic activities into daily routines promote long-term adherence and functional maintenance (Gardner et al., 2017).

 Clinical Considerations and Safety

Contraindication Screening: Comprehensive screening protocols ensure appropriate client selection and identify conditions requiring referrals. Established screening frameworks guide clinical decision-making regarding treatment suitability (Rushton et al., 2014).

Cultural Safety: Treatment delivery incorporates cultural competency principles relevant to Aotearoa New Zealand's diverse population, including Māori, Pasifika and other ethnic communities. Cultural safety frameworks ensure respectful and appropriate healthcare delivery (Wilson & Neville, 2009).

Professional Boundaries: Clear professional boundaries and scope of practice guidelines ensure ethical treatment delivery within Aotearoa New Zealand's regulatory framework. Practitioners must recognise limitations and maintain appropriate referral relationships with registered health professionals (Dryden et al., 2012).

 Limitations and Future Directions

Evidence Limitations: While individual components of the Ultimate Body Mechanic Treatment protocol have research support, the specific combination and delivery format requires validation through conducting case-studies. Current evidence for manual therapy interventions shows variable quality and often limited long-term follow-up (Bialosky et al., 2018).

Research Priorities: Future research should investigate:

• Comparative effectiveness against standard care approaches

• Long-term functional and pain outcomes

• Cost-effectiveness analysis

• Identification of optimal treatment frequency and duration

• Predictors of treatment response

Practice Development: Continued professional development should emphasise:

• Evidence-based best-practice integration

• Outcome measurement implementation

• Clinical reasoning skill development

• Interdisciplinary collaboration enhancement

 To conclude,

NZBMA’s Ultimate Body Mechanic Treatment represents an attempt to integrate contemporary massage manual therapy principles within a comprehensive biopsychosocial framework. While individual treatment components have research support, the specific protocol requires continues validation to establish the clinical effectiveness and optimal implementation parameters. The treatment approach aligns with current trends toward holistic, client-centred healthcare delivery while operating within Aotearoa New Zealand's regulatory framework for non-registered health service providers. Continued development should prioritise case-studies, outcome measurement and evidence-based best-practice principles to ensure optimal client outcomes and professional accountability. The evolution of soft tissue manual therapy toward evidence-based, biopsychosocial approaches represents an important advancement in conservative healthcare and massage therapy delivery. However, NZBMA recognises the need to continue seeking supported by rigorous current research methodologies and appropriate statistical analysis to maintain the professional credibility, client safety and high standard its seeking to create.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

• Bialosky, J. E., Beneciuk, J. M., Bishop, M. D., Coronado, R. A., Penza, C. W., Simon, C. B., & George, S. Z. (2018). Unraveling the mechanisms of manual therapy: Modeling an approach. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 48(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2018.7476

• Bialosky, J. E., Bishop, M. D., Price, D. D., Robinson, M. E., & George, S. Z. (2009). The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A comprehensive model. Manual Therapy, 14(5), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2008.09.001

• Bonazza, N. A., Smuin, D., Onks, C. A., Silvis, M. L., & Dhawan, A. (2017). Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(3), 725-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516641937

• Careers New Zealand. (2024). Massage therapist - How to enter the job. https://www.careers.govt.nz/jobs-database/health-and-community/health/massage-therapist/how-to-enter-the-job

• Cerezo-Téllez, E., Torres-Lacomba, M., Mayoral-Del-Moral, O., Sánchez-Sánchez, B., Dommerholt, J., & Gutiérrez-Ortega, C. (2016). Prevalence of myofascial pain syndrome in chronic non-specific neck pain: A population-based cross-sectional descriptive study. Pain Medicine, 17(12), 2369-2377. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw114

• Cheatham, S. W., Kolber, M. J., Cain, M., & Lee, M. (2015). The effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roll or roller massager on joint range of motion, muscle recovery, and performance: A systematic review. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 10(6), 827-838.

• Cramer, S. C., Sur, M., Dobkin, B. H., O'Brien, C., Sanger, T. D., Trojanowski, J. Q., ... & Vinogradov, S. (2011). Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain, 134(6), 1591-1609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr039

• Dryden, T., Baskwill, A., & Preyde, M. (2012). The drive for legitimation of massage therapy in New Zealand. International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork, 5(4), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v5i4.176

• Edwards, R. R., Dworkin, R. H., Sullivan, M. D., Turk, D. C., & Wasan, A. D. (2018). The role of psychosocial processes in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Journal of Pain, 17(9), T70-T92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.01.001

• Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460

• European Pain Federation. (2023). What is the bio-psycho-social model of pain? https://europeanpainfederation.eu/what-is-the-bio-psycho-social-model-of-pain/

• Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., & Lally, P. (2019). Habit interventions. In M. S. Hagger, L. D. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change. pp. 1-29. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.030

• Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 581-624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581

• Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003. New Zealand Government. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2003/0048/latest/DLM203312.html

• Higgs, J., & Edwards, H. (1999). Educating beginning practitioners: Challenges for health professional education. Chapman & Hall.

• Ingber, D. E. (2006). Cellular mechanotransduction: Putting all the pieces together again. FASEB Journal, 20(7), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.05-5424rev

• Jensen, M. P., Karoly, P., & Braver, S. (1986). The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain, 27(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9

• Jordan, J. L., Holden, M. A., Mason, E. E., & Foster, N. E. (2010). Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD005956. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005956.pub2

• Khan, K. M., & Scott, A. (2009). Mechanotherapy: How physical therapists' prescription of exercise promotes tissue repair. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(4), 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.054239

• Louw, A., Diener, I., Butler, D. S., & Puentedura, E. J. (2011). The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(12), 2041-2056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.198

• Macedo, L. G., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., & McAuley, J. H. (2009). Motor control exercise for persistent, nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review. Physical Therapy, 89(1), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080103

• Mankelow, J., Ryan, C., Taylor, P., Atkinson, G., Jones, H., Rajendran, D., ... & Barker, K. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of biopsychosocial pain education upon health care professional pain attitudes, knowledge, behavior and patient outcomes. Journal of Pain, 23(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2021.02.006

• Ministry of Health. (2023). About the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act. https://www.health.govt.nz/regulation-legislation/health-practitioners/about-the-act

• Moseley, G. L., & Butler, D. S. (2015). Fifteen years of explaining pain: The past, present, and future. Journal of Pain, 16(9), 807-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005

• New Zealand Legislation. (1907). Tohunga Suppression Act 1907. https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/tsa19077ev1907n13332.pdf

• New Zealand Legislation. (1920). Masseurs Registration Act 1920. https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/mra192011gv1920n16343.pdf

• New Zealand Legislation. (1935). Masseurs Registration Amendment Act 1935. https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/mraa19351935n26301.pdf

• New Zealand Legislation. (1964). Physiotherapy Amendment Act 1964. https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/paa19641964n17300.pdf

• New Zealand Legislation. (1978). Massage Parlours Act 1978. https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/mpa19781978n27303.pdf

• New Zealand Legislation. (1993). Human Rights Act 1993. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0082/latest/DLM304212.html

• New Zealand Legislation. (1994). Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1994/0088/latest/DLM333584.html

• New Zealand Legislation. (1999). Physiotherapy Amendment Act 1999. https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/paa19991999n137300.pdf

• New Zealand Legislation. (2003). Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2003/0048/latest/DLM203312.html

• New Zealand Legislation. (2003). Prostitution Reform Act 2003. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2003/0028/latest/DLM197815.html

• New Zealand Legislation. (2020). Privacy Act 2020. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2020/0031/latest/DLM7506000.html

• Nijs, J., Paul van Wilgen, C., Van Oosterwijck, J., van Ittersum, M., & Meeus, M. (2011). How to explain central sensitization to patients with 'unexplained' chronic musculoskeletal pain: Practice guidelines. Manual Therapy, 16(5), 413-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2011.04.005

• Rajendran, D., Bright, P., Bettles, S., Carnes, D., & Mullinger, B. (2016). What puts the evidence into evidence-informed osteopathy? A qualitative study. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 22, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2016.10.002

• Rushton, A., Rivett, D., Carlesso, L., Flynn, T., Hing, W., & Kerry, R. (2014). International framework for examination of the cervical region for potential of cervical arterial dysfunction prior to orthopaedic manual therapy intervention. Manual Therapy, 19(3), 222-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.11.005

• Sahrmann, S. A. (2002). Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. Mosby.

• Schleip, R., Müller, D. G., & Klingler, W. (2009). What is 'fascia'? A review of different nomenclatures. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 13(1), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.09.004

• Smith, D., & Darzins, P. (2018). Health and disability commissioner: Upholding consumer rights in New Zealand. Journal of Law and Medicine, 26(2), 345–356. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30574724/

• Southern Institute of Technology. (2024). Bachelor of therapeutic and sports massage. https://www.sit.ac.nz/Programme/Course/Bachelor_of_Therapeutic_and_Sports_Massage

• Sullivan, J. A., & Wong, S. (2012). The drive for legitimation of massage therapy in New Zealand. International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork, 5(4), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v5i4.197

• Wilson, D., & Neville, S. (2009). Culturally safe research with vulnerable populations. Contemporary Nurse, 33(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.33.1.69

• Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382-1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9

• Zech, A., Hübscher, M., Vogt, L., Banzer, W., Hänsel, F., & Pfeifer, K. (2010). Balance training for neuromuscular control and performance enhancement: A systematic review. Journal of Athletic Training, 45(4), 392-403. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-45.4.392